Socionica: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
m apostrofo tipografico |
m fixed typo |
||
Riga 10:
Nonostante ciò, giunse a risultati comparabili a quelli ottenuti nel continente americano ([[MBTI]]).
La socionica si basa sull'idea che il [[carattere (psicologia)|carattere]] di una persona agisca come un insieme di blocchi chiamati "funzioni psicologiche". Differenti combinazioni di queste funzioni danno adito a diverse modalità di accettare e produrre informazione, che originano differenti pattern mentali, valori, modelli comportamentali, e perciò diversi tipi di personalità<ref>'' Fink G. and Mayrhofer W . '' [http://inderscience.metapress.com/content/h040q1h67200h2n4/fulltext.html Cross-cultural competence and management] &
La socionica ha anche come caratteristica una teoria di relazioni interpersonali che esamina l'interazione di queste funzioni tra i tipi; essa è stata sviluppata fino ad adesso attraverso l'introspezione e l'osservazione; anche descrivendo una larga parte di comportamenti e interazioni umani<ref name=blunter2010>{{Cita pubblicazione|autore=Blutner R., Hochnadel E. |titolo=Two qubits for C.G. Jung’s theory of personality |rivista=Cognitive Systems Research |anno=2010 |volume=11 |numero=3 |pp=243-259 |url=http://blutner.de/Documents/Jung_rev.pdf}}<blockquote>"Socionics was developed in the 1970s and 1980s mainly by the Lithuanian researcher Ausˇra Augustinavicˇiute. The name ‘socionics' is derived from the word ‘society, since Augustinavicˇiute believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. The system of socionics is in several respects similar to the MBTI; however, whereas the latter is dominantly used in the USA and Western Europe, the former is mainly used in Russia and Eastern Europe. For more information, the reader is referred to the website of the International Institute of Socionics and to several scientific journals edited by this institution (see http://socionic.info/en/esocjur.html#top). Despite of several similarities there are also important
differences. For instance, the MBTI is based on questionnaires with so-called forced-choice questions. Forcedchoice means that the individual has to choose only one of two possible answers to each question. Obviously, such tests are self-referential. That means they are based on judgments of persons about themselves. Socionics rejects the use of such questionnaires and is based on interviews and direct observation of certain aspects of human behavior instead. However, if personality tests are well constructed and their questions are answered properly, we expect results that often make sense. For that reason, we do not reject test questions principally, but we have to take into account their self-referential character. Another difference relates to the fact that socionics tries to understand Jung's intuitive system and to provide a deeper explanation for it, mainly in terms of informational metabolism (Kepinski & PZWL, 1972). Further, socionics is not so much a theory of personalities per se, but much more a theory of type relations providing an analysis of the relationships that arise as a consequence of the interaction of people with different personalities."</blockquote></ref>, finora non ha dato abbastanza prove sperimentali <ref>DeLong R. [http://www.socionics.us/philosophy/scientific_theory.shtml La socionica come una teoria scientifica potenziale]</ref>.
| |||