Discussione:Cornelis Pieter van den Hoek
Ultimo commento: 9 anni fa, lasciato da Taketa in merito all'argomento Link to author
Questa voce contiene una traduzione, completa o parziale, della voce originale:
«Cornelis Pieter van den Hoek» tratta da Wikipedia in inglese.
Consulta la cronologia della pagina originale per conoscere l'elenco degli autori.
«Cornelis Pieter van den Hoek» tratta da Wikipedia in inglese.
Consulta la cronologia della pagina originale per conoscere l'elenco degli autori.
Link to author
modificaHi, this article is translated from my article on en.wikipedia, en:Cornelis Pieter van den Hoek. Could someone please add a link to that article or to my account as per CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Thank you, Taketa (msg) 10:45, 6 dic 2014 (CET)
- See template above (according to the policies on it.wiki). By the way, the one on en.wiki it's not your article: you're one of the contributors and, as such, you deserve the credits, but at the same extent as any other user who contributed to that article. You're not in any way the owner of the article and you can't claim personal rights all on your own. Especially considering that also the article on en.wiki is, on its turn, a translation from nl.wiki. The owner is the whole Wikipedia community. --L736El'adminalcolico 14:41, 16 dic 2014 (CET)
- Thank you for the response and action. Note that first of the article is not a translation of nlwiki, ony minor sections are (and they are linked to by weblink in the edit summary). Secondly, that by writing on Wikipedia I grant a licence (CC-By-SA 3.0) to use my text under certain condition. The copyright stays with the author. As can be seen at enwiki I am the main author of most of the text, and pretty much all the text translated here. As such I am in fact the owner of the text, but ofcourse not of the article. A link to en.wiki will suffice, but a link to my name would have sufficed as well (since I am the author). As a bureaucrat of nl.wiki and a licence reviewer of Commons, I am aware of the copyright and ownership guidelines. All the best, Taketa (msg) 14:48, 16 dic 2014 (CET)
- PS: Please note that I greatly appreciate anyone helping to translate Wikipedia articles and spreading klowledge. I fully encourage it. In this instance I simply noted the missing reference to the source and noted it. My request was ignored by the translator, who is clearly active, so I tried again in a more direct manner. This takes nothing away from my full approval of all translation work. All the best, Taketa (msg) 15:02, 16 dic 2014 (CET)
- Thank you for the response and action. Note that first of the article is not a translation of nlwiki, ony minor sections are (and they are linked to by weblink in the edit summary). Secondly, that by writing on Wikipedia I grant a licence (CC-By-SA 3.0) to use my text under certain condition. The copyright stays with the author. As can be seen at enwiki I am the main author of most of the text, and pretty much all the text translated here. As such I am in fact the owner of the text, but ofcourse not of the article. A link to en.wiki will suffice, but a link to my name would have sufficed as well (since I am the author). As a bureaucrat of nl.wiki and a licence reviewer of Commons, I am aware of the copyright and ownership guidelines. All the best, Taketa (msg) 14:48, 16 dic 2014 (CET)
- See template above (according to the policies on it.wiki). By the way, the one on en.wiki it's not your article: you're one of the contributors and, as such, you deserve the credits, but at the same extent as any other user who contributed to that article. You're not in any way the owner of the article and you can't claim personal rights all on your own. Especially considering that also the article on en.wiki is, on its turn, a translation from nl.wiki. The owner is the whole Wikipedia community. --L736El'adminalcolico 14:41, 16 dic 2014 (CET)