Utente:Grasso Luigi/sandbox4/Teoremi di isomorfismo

In matematica ci sono vari teoremi di isomorfismo, che asseriscono generalmente che alcuni insiemi dotati di opportune strutture algebriche sono isomorfe.

Teoria dei gruppi

modifica

In teoria dei gruppi ci sono tre teoremi d'isomorfismo, che valgono anche, con opportune modifiche, per anelli e moduli. I teoremi furono formulati originariamente da Richard Dedekind; successivamente Emmy Noether li rese più generali nell'articolo Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl und Funktionenkörpern pubblicato nel 1927 in Mathematische Annalen, per essere poi sviluppati nella forma moderna da Bartel Leendert van der Waerden nel suo libro Algebra.

Primo teorema d'isomorfismo

modifica

Se   è un omomorfismo fra due gruppi   e  , allora il nucleo di   è un sottogruppo normale di  , ed il gruppo quoziente   è isomorfo all'immagine di  . In simboli:

 

L'isomorfismo è canonico, indotto dalla mappa  : la classe   è mandata in  .

Questo teorema è detto teorema fondamentale di omomorfismo.

 

Proprietà universale del conucleo  

modifica

Se   è un omomorfismo e   è un sottogruppo normale di   contenuto in  , esiste un unico omomorfismo   tale che

 

dove   è la proiezione canonica  .

Secondo teorema d'isomorfismo (teorema del diamante)

modifica

Siano   e   due sottogruppi di un gruppo  , con   sottogruppo normale. Allora il sottoinsieme prodotto

 

è anch'esso un sottogruppo di  , e inoltre:

  •   è normale anche in  ,
  •   è normale in  ,
  •  

L'isomorfismo è canonico, indotto dalla mappa

 

Terzo teorema d'isomorfismo

modifica

Siano   due sottogruppi normali di   con   contenuto in  . Vale il seguente isomorfismo:

 

Anche questo isomorfismo è canonico.

We first present the isomorphism theorems of the groups.

Note on numbers and names

modifica

Below we present four theorems, labelled A, B, C and D. They are often numbered as "First isomorphism theorem", "Second..." and so on; however, there is no universal agreement on the numbering. Here we give some examples of the group isomorphism theorems in the literature. Notice that these theorems have analogs for rings and modules.

Comparison of the names of the group isomorphism theorems
Comment Author Theorem A Theorem B Theorem C
No "third" theorem Jacobson[1] Fundamental theorem of homomorphisms (Second isomorphism theorem) "often called the first isomorphism theorem"
van der Waerden,[2] DurbinTemplate:Refn Fundamental theorem of homomorphisms First isomorphism theorem Second isomorphism theorem
Knapp[3] (No name) Second isomorphism theorem First isomorphism theorem
Grillet[4] Homomorphism theorem Second isomorphism theorem First isomorphism theorem
Three numbered theorems (Other convention per Grillet) First isomorphism theorem Third isomorphism theorem Second isomorphism theorem
Rotman[5] First isomorphism theorem Second isomorphism theorem Third isomorphism theorem
Fraleigh[6] Fundamental homomorphism theorem or first isomorphism theorem Second isomorphism theorem Third isomorphism theorem
Dummit & Foote[7] First isomorphism theorem Second or Diamond isomorphism theorem Third isomorphism theorem
No numbering Milne[8] Homomorphism theorem Isomorphism theorem Correspondence theorem
Scott[9] Homomorphism theorem Isomorphism theorem Freshman theorem

It is less common to include the Theorem D, usually known as the lattice theorem or the correspondence theorem, as one of isomorphism theorems, but when included, it is the last one.

Statement of the theorems

modifica

Theorem A (groups)

modifica
  Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms.
 
Diagram of the fundamental theorem on homomorphisms

Let G and H be groups, and let f : G → H be a homomorphism. Then:

  1. The kernel of f is a normal subgroup of G,
  2. The image of f is a subgroup of H, and
  3. The image of f is isomorphic to the quotient group G / ker(f).

In particular, if f is surjective then H is isomorphic to G / ker(f).

This theorem is usually called the first isomorphism theorem.

Theorem B (groups)

modifica
 
Diagram for theorem B4. The two quotient groups (dotted) are isomorphic.

Let   be a group. Let   be a subgroup of  , and let   be a normal subgroup of  . Then the following hold:

  1. The product   is a subgroup of  ,
  2. The subgroup   is a normal subgroup of  ,
  3. The intersection   is a normal subgroup of  , and
  4. The quotient groups   and   are isomorphic.

Technically, it is not necessary for   to be a normal subgroup, as long as   is a subgroup of the normalizer of   in  . In this case,   is not a normal subgroup of  , but   is still a normal subgroup of the product  .

This theorem is sometimes called the second isomorphism theorem,[8] diamond theorem[10] or the parallelogram theorem.[11]

An application of the second isomorphism theorem identifies projective linear groups: for example, the group on the complex projective line starts with setting  , the group of invertible 2 × 2 complex matrices,  , the subgroup of determinant 1 matrices, and   the normal subgroup of scalar matrices  , we have  , where   is the identity matrix, and  . Then the second isomorphism theorem states that:

 

Theorem C (groups)

modifica

Let   be a group, and   a normal subgroup of  . Then

  1. If   is a subgroup of   such that  , then   has a subgroup isomorphic to  .
  2. Every subgroup of   is of the form   for some subgroup   of   such that  .
  3. If   is a normal subgroup of   such that  , then   has a normal subgroup isomorphic to  .
  4. Every normal subgroup of   is of the form   for some normal subgroup   of   such that  .
  5. If   is a normal subgroup of   such that  , then the quotient group   is isomorphic to  .

The last statement is sometimes referred to as the third isomorphism theorem. The first four statements are often subsumed under Theorem D below, and referred to as the lattice theorem, correspondence theorem, or fourth isomorphism theorem.

Theorem D (groups)

modifica
  Lo stesso argomento in dettaglio: Lattice theorem.

Let   be a group, and   a normal subgroup of  . The canonical projection homomorphism   defines a bijective correspondence between the set of subgroups of   containing   and the set of (all) subgroups of  . Under this correspondence normal subgroups correspond to normal subgroups.

This theorem is sometimes called the correspondence theorem, the lattice theorem, and the fourth isomorphism theorem.

The Zassenhaus lemma (also known as the butterfly lemma) is sometimes called the fourth isomorphism theorem.[12]

Discussion

modifica

The first isomorphism theorem can be expressed in category theoretical language by saying that the category of groups is (normal epi, mono)-factorizable; in other words, the normal epimorphisms and the monomorphisms form a factorization system for the category. This is captured in the commutative diagram in the margin, which shows the objects and morphisms whose existence can be deduced from the morphism  . The diagram shows that every morphism in the category of groups has a kernel in the category theoretical sense; the arbitrary morphism f factors into  , where ι is a monomorphism and π is an epimorphism (in a conormal category, all epimorphisms are normal). This is represented in the diagram by an object   and a monomorphism   (kernels are always monomorphisms), which complete the short exact sequence running from the lower left to the upper right of the diagram. The use of the exact sequence convention saves us from having to draw the zero morphisms from   to   and  .

If the sequence is right split (i.e., there is a morphism σ that maps   to a Template:Pi-preimage of itself), then G is the semidirect product of the normal subgroup   and the subgroup  . If it is left split (i.e., there exists some   such that  ), then it must also be right split, and   is a direct product decomposition of G. In general, the existence of a right split does not imply the existence of a left split; but in an abelian category (such as that of abelian groups), left splits and right splits are equivalent by the splitting lemma, and a right split is sufficient to produce a direct sum decomposition  . In an abelian category, all monomorphisms are also normal, and the diagram may be extended by a second short exact sequence  .

In the second isomorphism theorem, the product SN is the join of S and N in the lattice of subgroups of G, while the intersection S ∩ N is the meet.

The third isomorphism theorem is generalized by the nine lemma to abelian categories and more general maps between objects.

Teoria degli anelli

modifica

The statements of the theorems for rings are similar, with the notion of a normal subgroup replaced by the notion of an ideal.

Theorem A (rings)

modifica

Let   and   be rings, and let   be a ring homomorphism. Then:

  1. The kernel of   is an ideal of  ,
  2. The image of   is a subring of  , and
  3. The image of   is isomorphic to the quotient ring  .

In particular, if   is surjective then   is isomorphic to  .[13]

Theorem B (rings)

modifica

Let R be a ring. Let S be a subring of R, and let I be an ideal of R. Then:

  1. The sum S + I = {s + i | s ∈ Si ∈ I } is a subring of R,
  2. The intersection S ∩ I is an ideal of S, and
  3. The quotient rings (S + I) / I and S / (S ∩ I) are isomorphic.

Theorem C (rings)

modifica

Let R be a ring, and I an ideal of R. Then

  1. If   is a subring of   such that  , then   is a subring of  .
  2. Every subring of   is of the form   for some subring   of   such that  .
  3. If   is an ideal of   such that  , then   is an ideal of  .
  4. Every ideal of   is of the form   for some ideal   of   such that  .
  5. If   is an ideal of   such that  , then the quotient ring   is isomorphic to  .

Theorem D (rings)

modifica

Let   be an ideal of  . The correspondence   is an inclusion-preserving bijection between the set of subrings   of   that contain   and the set of subrings of  . Furthermore,   (a subring containing  ) is an ideal of   if and only if   is an ideal of  .[14]


Teoria dei numeri

modifica

In teoria dei numeri, esiste il seguente teorema d'isomorfismo di Ax-Kochen. Il teorema afferma che se   e   sono terne di Peano allora esiste una mappa   tale che:

  •   è biiettiva;
  •  ;
  •  .
  1. ^ Jacobson (2009), sec 1.10
  2. ^ van der Waerden, Algebra (1994).
  3. ^ Knapp (2016), sec IV 2
  4. ^ Grillet (2007), sec. I 5
  5. ^ Rotman (2003), sec. 2.6
  6. ^ Fraleigh (2003), Chap. 14, 34
  7. ^ David Steven Dummit, Abstract algebra, Richard M. Foote, Third, Hoboken, NJ, 2004, pp. 97–98, ISBN 0-471-43334-9.
  8. ^ a b Milne (2013), Chap. 1, sec. Theorems concerning homomorphisms
  9. ^ Scott (1964), secs 2.2 and 2.3
  10. ^ I. Martin Isaacs, Algebra: A Graduate Course, American Mathematical Soc., 1994, 33, ISBN 978-0-8218-4799-2.
  11. ^ Paul Moritz Cohn, Classic Algebra, Wiley, 2000, 245, ISBN 978-0-471-87731-8.
  12. ^ Robert A. Wilson, The Finite Simple Groups, Springer-Verlag London, 2009, DOI:10.1007/978-1-84800-988-2, ISBN 978-1-4471-2527-3.
  13. ^ Samuel Moy, An Introduction to the Theory of Field Extensions (PDF), su math.uchicago.edu, 2022.
  14. ^ Abstract algebra, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, 2004, 246, ISBN 978-0-471-43334-7.
  Portale Matematica: accedi alle voci di Wikipedia che trattano di matematica